Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Pharmacologic identification of the lower esophageal sphincter
James Christensen
James Christensen
Published April 1, 1970
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1970;49(4):681-691. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106280.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Pharmacologic identification of the lower esophageal sphincter

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The distal 2/3 of the opossum esophagus contains only smooth muscle. Manometry shows that the most distal 1-2 cm is the lower esophageal sphincter. We used a variety of agonists to seek differences between circular muscle from the sphincteric segment and more rostral levels. Isometric contractions of strips from the distal 6 cm were recorded in vitro in response to acetylcholine, carbachol, methacholine, nicotine. DMPP, norepinephrine, norepinephrine with propranolol, barium, atropine, and potassium. Significant differences in threshold concentration occurred for all drugs except barium, atropine, and potassium, the more distal strips being more sensitive. The gradient of threshold was much steeper for norepinephrine than for the other drugs. Maximal responses did not differ among levels for the choline esters or ganglionic stimulants, but showed proximal diminution for norepinephrine. These differences in threshold concentration could represent differences in distribution density of drug receptor sites, differences in affinity of receptors for the agonists, differences in rates of uptake of agonists, or differences in rates of enzymatic hydrolysis; or they may have no common basis. The sphincter is defined, at least in part, in the esophageal wall rather than in the central nervous system. The greater magnitude of the difference in sensitivity to norepinephrine than for the other agents suggests that the adrenergic innervation is important in defining the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors

James Christensen

×

Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 94 1
PDF 47 10
Scanned page 457 5
Citation downloads 59 0
Totals 657 16
Total Views 673
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts