Use of digitalis in myocardial infarction is controversial. To determine the efficacy and toxic threshold, serial infusions of 3 μg/kg per min of acetyl-strophanthidin were given to six intact conscious dogs 24 hr before and 1 hr, 2 days, and 7 days after myocardial infarction induced by inflation of a balloon cuff implanted on the left anterior descending coronary artery. Within 1 hr after myocardial infarction, heart rate increased by 28%. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased from 7 to 20 mm Hg, and stroke volume decreased by 25%. At this time acetylstrophanthidin caused no beneficial hemodynamic change, 1 wk later, the heart rate and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure had declined toward normal but remained elevated. At this time, acetylstrophanthidin lowered left ventricular end-diastolic pressure by 25%, and increased the stroke volume and cardiac output by 25% and 21% respectively, without any change in heart rate or aortic pressure. Tolerance to acetylstrophanthidin, defined as appearance of ventricular tachycardia, declined the 1st hr after myocardial infarction by 24% (P<0.05) from the control level of 43 ±4 μg/kg (SEM), but subsequently returned to control.
Raj Kumar, William B. Hood Jr., Julio Joison, David P. Gilmour, John C. Norman, Walter H. Abelmann
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 102 | 1 |
39 | 11 | |
Scanned page | 251 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 52 | 0 |
Totals | 444 | 13 |
Total Views | 457 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.