The sugars present in hydrolyzed extracts of human liver and brain were analyzed by gasliquid chromatography after conversion to their alditol acetates. The samples analyzed were obtained from control subjects, patients with gargoylism, and patients with a few other kinds of storage disorders. Accumulation of galactose was demonstrated in the liver and the brain of two patients with gargoylism, and in the liver samples, high levels of mannose were found too. We also studied the hydrolysis of a number of galactosides by homogenates from different tissues in the control subjects and in the patients. Separation methods and kinetic studies demonstrated the presence in normal human tissues of two different β-galactosidases, which we call enzyme A and enzyme B, respectively. Enzyme A hydrolyzed all the β-galactosides tested. Enzyme B hydrolyzed the synthetic substrates tested (4-methylumbelliferyl-, p-nitrophenyl-, o-nitrophenyl-, and phenyl-β-galactoside) but not the natural substrates tested (ceramide-β-galactoside, ceramide lactoside, transferrin glycopeptide, and keratan sulfate). Enzyme B also exerted β-glucosidase activity. In various tissues from patients with gargoylism, deficiency of β-galactosidase A could be demonstrated.
Björn Hultberg, Per-Arne Öckerman, Arne Dahlqvist
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 118 | 0 |
83 | 18 | |
Scanned page | 348 | 6 |
Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
Totals | 610 | 24 |
Total Views | 634 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.