The hemodynamic effects of isoproterenol infusion, 0.5 μg/kg per min were evaluated in eight intact anesthetized dogs during cardiac tamponade. During tamponade, the mean of pericardial pressures was increased from — 1.5 to 12.5 mm Hg, and the mean of right atrial pressures was increased from 1 to 12.4 mm Hg. Mean cardiac output fell from 144.8 to 44.8 ml/kg per min (P < 0.001), and rose to 105.6 ml/kg per min (P < 0.001) with isoproterenol. Mean cardiac stroke volume fell from 20.3 to 6.1 ml during tamponade (P < 0.001) and rose to 12.1 ml with isoproterenol (P < 0.001). The heart rate increased from 193.3 beats/min during tamponade to 217.5 beats/min with isoproterenol (P < 0.05). During isoproterenol infusion, the mean right atrial pressure and mean pericardial pressure decreased significantly. With cardiac tamponade, the mean blood pressure fell from 157.5 to 126.1 mm Hg (P < 0.01) and did not change significantly with isoproterenol, 11 additional animals were studied with norepinephrine infusion during tamponade. There were no consistent hemodynamic effects with infusions of 0.5 and 1 μg/kg per min. With norepinephrine 2, 5, and 10 μg/kg per min cardiac output rose in some experiments. Isoproterenol infusion increased the cardiac output during tamponade principally by increasing cardiac stroke volume and to a lesser degree by increasing the heart rate. It is postulated that the increased stroke volume resulted from an increased ejection fraction with greater decrease in end-systolic than end-diastolic ventricular volume. These effects are consistent with the known positive inotropic, peripheral vasodilator, and positive chronotropic effects of isoproterenol.
Noble O. Fowler, John C. Holmes
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 148 | 13 |
45 | 56 | |
Scanned page | 185 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 54 | 0 |
Totals | 432 | 70 |
Total Views | 502 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.