Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Article has an altmetric score of 3

See more details

Referenced in 1 patents
11 readers on Mendeley
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (172)

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI105927

A comparison of heritable abnormal lipoprotein patterns as defined by two different techniques

D. S. Fredrickson, R. I. Levy, and F. T. Lindgren

Molecular Disease Branch, National Heart Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20014

Donner Laboratory, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

Find articles by Fredrickson, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Molecular Disease Branch, National Heart Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20014

Donner Laboratory, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

Find articles by Levy, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Molecular Disease Branch, National Heart Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20014

Donner Laboratory, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

Find articles by Lindgren, F. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published November 1, 1968 - More info

Published in Volume 47, Issue 11 on November 1, 1968
J Clin Invest. 1968;47(11):2446–2457. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI105927.
© 1968 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published November 1, 1968 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Eight plasma lipoprotein patterns currently employed in attempts to identify different forms of familial dyslipoproteinemia have been compared by two methods. The first (NIH method) is based on paper electrophoretic patterns produced by the four lipoprotein classes obtained by paper electrophoresis in albuminated buffer, coupled with the measurement of the total cholesterol of three of these lipoprotein classes and ascertainment of abnormal flotation of beta-migrating lipoproteins. The second (Donner method) is based on lipoprotein patterns obtained in the analytical ultracentrifuge, adapted for computer analysis and complemented by chemical determination of the concentration of chylomicrons (lipoproteins of Sf° > 400). Pooled samples representing patients with five types of familial hyperlipoproteinemia and three different forms of inherited lipoprotein dificiency were separately analyzed. For six of the eight pools, both methods provided a distinctive lipoprotein pattern in terms of changes in one or more variables. For the remaining two pools, type IV hyperlipoproteinemia and the heterozygote for Tangier disease, both methods provided identical but not unique patterns. The results indicate that lipoprotein analyses obtained by either method may be used interconvertibly in further genetic and other clinical studies.

Images.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 2446
page 2446
icon of scanned page 2447
page 2447
icon of scanned page 2448
page 2448
icon of scanned page 2449
page 2449
icon of scanned page 2450
page 2450
icon of scanned page 2451
page 2451
icon of scanned page 2452
page 2452
icon of scanned page 2453
page 2453
icon of scanned page 2454
page 2454
icon of scanned page 2455
page 2455
icon of scanned page 2456
page 2456
icon of scanned page 2457
page 2457
Version history
  • Version 1 (November 1, 1968): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

Article has an altmetric score of 3
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (172)

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Referenced in 1 patents
11 readers on Mendeley
See more details