Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Hemodynamic effects after conversion of arrhythmias
Robert J. Corliss, … , Charles W. Crumpton, George G. Rowe
Robert J. Corliss, … , Charles W. Crumpton, George G. Rowe
Published August 1, 1968
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1968;47(8):1774-1786. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI105867.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Hemodynamic effects after conversion of arrhythmias

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Systemic and coronary hemodynamic parameters were determined during an arrhythmia and immediately after a direct current transthoracic shock given in an attempt to convert the arrhythmia to a sinus mechanism. No anesthesia or drugs were administered between the two studies. 16 patients with atrial fibrillation converted to sinus rhythm and five did not. In two patients with atrial flutter and one with supraventricular tachycardia, the arrhythmia was corrected. The arrhythmia persisted in a single patient with ventricular tachycardia. Utilizing each patient as his own control, we compared statistically various hemodynamic parameters before and after the shock. In addition, the group of patients whose atrial fibrillation terminated was compared to the group treated in the same manner but in which the atrial fibrillation persisted. Pressures in the right side of the heart decreased in both groups so that the changes appeared to be caused by factors associated with the transthoracic direct current shock or the catheterization procedure. The differences between those with atrial fibrillation who converted to sinus rhythm as compared to those who did not were a decrease in heart rate, an increase in stroke volume, and an increase in cardiac efficiency. There was no immediate effect on the cardiac output or coronary blood flow.

Authors

Robert J. Corliss, David H. McKenna, Charles W. Crumpton, George G. Rowe

×

Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 158 7
PDF 44 20
Scanned page 504 1
Citation downloads 58 0
Totals 764 28
Total Views 792
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts