The metabolic fate of the tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor, α-methyl-para-tyrosine (α-MPT), was studied after oral administration of single and multiple doses to patients with pheochromocytoma and essential hypertension. No major urinary excretion product was found other than the drug itself, which accounted for 44-88% of the fate of single or repeated oral doses. Though less than 1% of the administered drug could be recovered in the urine as catechol metabolites, it was possible to identify α-methyldopa, α-methyldopamine, and α-methylnorepinephrine and to quantify the excretion of the first two of these compounds. This minor route of metabolism required revision of methodology (presented herein) for measuring urinary catecholamines during α-MPT treatment since these compounds produce spurious fluorescence in routine methods of assay for catecholamines. The catechol metabolites probably are not present in sufficient amounts to contribute to the biochemical effects of the drug. Determination of plasma concentrations of α-MPT during maintenance therapy and considerations of the kinetics of enzyme inhibition enabled a calculation to be made of the degree of inhibition of catecholamine synthesis to be expected in the patient. This was calculated to be about 75% for the highest doses employed and is similar in magnitude to experimentally determined values.
Karl Engelman, Eric Jéquier, Sidney Udenfriend, Albert Sjoerdsma
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 227 | 5 |
51 | 18 | |
Scanned page | 342 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 44 | 0 |
Totals | 664 | 25 |
Total Views | 689 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.