Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Effect of Pulmonary Blood Flow upon Lung Mechanics
Stanley Giannelli Jr., … , Stephen M. Ayres, M. E. Buehler
Stanley Giannelli Jr., … , Stephen M. Ayres, M. E. Buehler
Published October 1, 1967
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1967;46(10):1625-1642. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI105655.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Effect of Pulmonary Blood Flow upon Lung Mechanics

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Airway pressure was continuously recorded in an isolated horizontally mounted canine heart-lung preparation during abrupt, stepwise 100-200 ml inflations to 20-25 cm water pressure, and subsequent deflations. With each change in volume there was a steep rise or fall in pressure, followed by stress relaxation to a static equilibrium airway pressure. Comparison was made between the nonperfused state and during perfusion with whole blood at 100 ml/kg dog wt per min, and left atrial pressure of 10 mm Hg. Pressure tracings were similar during deflation in the perfused and the nonperfused lung. During inflation, in the middle range of lung inflation volumes, the peak inflation and equilibrium airway pressures were greater in the nonperfused state; maximum difference of static pressures in nine preparations averaged 146% of perfused values and the average stress relaxation difference from eight of these was 276%. Lung distensibility was the same with packed red cells or plasma perfusates and was not changed by varying the perfusion rate up to 220 ml/kg per min. During cyclic ventilation, dynamic compliance was similarly greater in the perfused than in the nonperfused state in the middle range of inflation volumes. Static distention of the vascular bed produced similar results with progressive improvement in distensibility in mid-inflation range up to a hydrostatic pressure of 15 cm blood. These data suggest that the distended pulmonary vascular bed provides structural airway support which facilitates entry of gas into the terminal respiratory units at diminished pressure.

Authors

Stanley Giannelli Jr., Stephen M. Ayres, M. E. Buehler

×

Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 99 2
PDF 60 8
Scanned page 676 6
Citation downloads 52 0
Totals 887 16
Total Views 903
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts