Advertisement
Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI105514
University of Washington and Veterans Administration Hospital, Department of Medicine, Seattle, Wash.
†Clinical Investigator, Veterans Administration Hospital, Seattle, Wash.
Address requests for reprints to Dr. Daniel Porte, Jr., Veterans Administration Hospital, 4435 Beacon Ave. S., Seattle, Wash. 98108.
*Submitted for publication June 9, 1966; accepted September 22, 1966.
Supported in part by grants AM-02456, T1-AM-5020, and AM-06670 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases. A portion of the study was conducted at the Clinical Research Center facility of the University of Washington (grant FR-37 from the National Institutes of Health).
Presented in part before a joint meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation and the American Federation for Clinical Research, May 1, 1966, Atlantic City, N. J.
Find articles by Porte, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published January 1, 1967 - More info
Normal adult men and women have been infused with epinephrine, 6 μg per minute, during lipolytic blockade with nicotinic acid, beta-adrenergic blockade with propranolol and Butoxamine, and alpha-adrenergic blockade with phentolamine. Epinephrine infusion was associated with low serum levels of immunoreactive insulin (IRI) except when phentolamine was given simultaneously. These findings are compatible with an alpha receptor mechanism for the epinephrine inhibition of insulin release. Phentolamine had no blocking effects on the tachycardia and widened pulse pressure or lipolytic stimulation by epinephrine, whereas both propranolol and Butoxamine blocked lipolysis, tachycardia, and widened pulse pressure. These findings are consistent with an alpha receptor blocking action for phentolamine and beta receptor blocking action for propranolol and Butoxamine. Inhibition of lipolysis by nicotinic acid did not alter IRI or glucose responses to epinephrine. It is concluded that the lipolytic effect of epinephrine is unrelated to its effects on IRI release. Lipolytic blockade by nicotinic acid also did not change IRI or glucose in fasting subjects or their responses to a glucose infusion, 300 mg per minute. These observations appear to conflict with the Randle hypothesis (the glucose-fatty acid cycle) and raise some doubt as to whether plasma FFA concentrations are direct determinants of glucose or IRI concentrations in normal man.
Images.