Go to
JCI Insight
About
Editors
Consulting Editors
For authors
Publication ethics
Publication alerts by email
Advertising
Job board
Contact
100th anniversary
Current issue
Past issues
By specialty
COVID-19
Cardiology
Gastroenterology
Immunology
Metabolism
Nephrology
Neuroscience
Oncology
Pulmonology
Vascular biology
All ...
Videos
Conversations with Giants in Medicine
Video Abstracts
Reviews
Reviews
View all reviews ...
Review Series
Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
Lung inflammatory injury and tissue repair (Jul 2023)
Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Feb 2023)
Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
View all review series ...
Viewpoint
Collections
In-Press Preview
Clinical Medicine
Research Letters
Letters to the Editor
Editorials
Commentaries
Reviews
Viewpoints
Top read articles
Clinical Medicine
A COMPARISON OF PITUITRIN WITH THE ANTIDIURETIC SUBSTANCE FOUND IN HUMAN URINE AND PLACENTA
George C. Ham, Eugene M. Landis
George C. Ham, Eugene M. Landis
Published July 1, 1942
Citation Information:
J Clin Invest.
1942;
21(4)
:455-470.
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI101322
.
View:
Text
|
PDF
Research Article
A COMPARISON OF PITUITRIN WITH THE ANTIDIURETIC SUBSTANCE FOUND IN HUMAN URINE AND PLACENTA
Text
PDF
Abstract
Authors
George C. Ham, Eugene M. Landis
×
Other pages:
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
Other pages:
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470