Usage Information

Pravastatin to prevent obstetrical complications in women with antiphospholipid syndrome
Maged M. Costantine
Maged M. Costantine
Published July 25, 2016
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2016;126(8):2792-2794. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI89137.
View: Text | PDF
Commentary

Pravastatin to prevent obstetrical complications in women with antiphospholipid syndrome

Abstract

Pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are at a high risk of obstetrical complications. The current standard of care, including the use of low-dose aspirin and heparin, has not been shown to prevent preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Due to the similarities in pathophysiology among preeclampsia, IUGR, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, statins have been proposed for treating and/or preventing these obstetrical complications. In this issue of the JCI, Lefkou et al. report on a small, observational trial that showed a dramatic improvement in both maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes in women with APS given pravastatin after the onset of preeclampsia and/or IUGR compared with women in the control group. These results, along with other recent clinical studies, support further evaluation of statins for prevention of preeclampsia in a large-scale randomized clinical trial.

Authors

Maged M. Costantine

×

Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 310 107
PDF 63 33
Citation downloads 67 0
Totals 440 140
Total Views 580

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement