Previous work has indicated that complement is a mediator of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. To investigate the components of complement responsible for this effect, we examined a model of renal I/R injury in C3-, C4-, C5-, and C6-deficient mice. We occluded the renal arteries and veins (40–58 minutes) and, after reperfusion (0–72 hours), assessed renal structural and functional injury. C3-, C5-, and C6-deficient mice were protected from renal I/R injury, whereas C4-deficient mice were not protected. C6-deficient mice treated with antibody to block C5a generation showed no additional protection from I/R injury. Reconstitution with C6 alone restored the I/R injury in C6-deficient mice. Tubular epithelial cells were the main structures damaged by complement-mediated attack, and, in contrast, the renal vessels were spared. Neutrophil infiltration and myeloperoxidase activity were reduced in C-deficient mouse kidney, but by a similar extent in C3-deficient and C6-deficient mice. We conclude that the membrane attack complex of complement (in which C5 and C6 participate) may account for the effect of complement on mouse renal I/R injury. Neither C5a-mediated neutrophil infiltration nor the classic pathway, in which C4 participates, appears to contribute to I/R injury in this model. By contrast with other organs, such as the heart, the primary effect of complement in the ischemic area is on the parenchymal cell rather than the vascular endothelial cell. The membrane attack complex of complement is a potential target for prevention of I/R injury in this model.
Wuding Zhou, Conrad A. Farrar, Katsushige Abe, Julian R. Pratt, James E. Marsh, Yi Wang, Gregory L. Stahl, Steven H. Sacks
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 537 | 99 |
79 | 40 | |
Figure | 337 | 22 |
Table | 77 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 52 | 0 |
Totals | 1,082 | 161 |
Total Views | 1,243 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.