The pathogenesis of septic shock occurring after Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia was studied in a rabbit model. The airspace instillation of the cytotoxic P. aeruginosa strain PA103 into the rabbit caused a consistent alveolar epithelial injury, progressive bacteremia, and septic shock. The lung instillation of a noncytotoxic, isogenic mutant strain (PA103ΔUT), which is defective for production of type III secreted toxins, did not cause either systemic inflammatory response or septic shock, despite a potent inflammatory response in the lung. The intravenous injection of PA103 did not cause shock or an increase in TNF-α, despite the fact that the animals were bacteremic. The systemic administration of either anti–TNF-α serum or recombinant human IL-10 improved both septic shock and bacteremia in the animals that were instilled with PA103. Radiolabeled TNF-α instilled in the lung significantly leaked into the circulation only in the presence of alveolar epithelial injury. We conclude that injury to the alveolar epithelium allows the release of proinflammatory mediators into the circulation that are primarily responsible for septic shock. Our results demonstrate the importance of compartmentalization of inflammatory mediators in the lung, and the crucial role of bacterial cytotoxins in causing alveolar epithelial damage in the pathogenesis of acute septic shock in P. aeruginosa pneumonia.
Kiyoyasu Kurahashi, Osamu Kajikawa, Teiji Sawa, Maria Ohara, Michael A. Gropper, Dara W. Frank, Thomas R. Martin, Jeanine P. Wiener-Kronish
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 828 | 327 |
79 | 45 | |
Figure | 329 | 18 |
Table | 42 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 67 | 0 |
Totals | 1,345 | 390 |
Total Views | 1,735 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.