The identification of biomarkers that distinguish between aggressive and indolent forms of prostate cancer (PCa) is crucial for diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we used cultured cells derived from prostate tissue from patients with PCa to define a molecular mechanism underlying the most aggressive form of PCa that involves the functional activation of eNOS and HIFs in association with estrogen receptor β (ERβ). Cells from patients with poor prognosis exhibited a constitutively hypoxic phenotype and increased NO production. Upon estrogen treatment, formation of ERβ/eNOS, ERβ/HIF-1α, or ERβ/HIF-2α combinatorial complexes led to chromatin remodeling and transcriptional induction of prognostic genes. Tissue microarray analysis, using an independent cohort of patients, established a hierarchical predictive power for these proteins, with expression of eNOS plus ERβ and nuclear eNOS plus HIF-2α being the most relevant indicators of adverse clinical outcome. Genetic or pharmacologic modulation of eNOS expression and activity resulted in reciprocal conversion of the transcriptional signature in cells from patients with bad or good outcome, respectively, highlighting the relevance of eNOS in PCa progression. Our work has considerable clinical relevance, since it may enable the earlier diagnosis of aggressive PCa through routine biopsy assessment of eNOS, ERβ, and HIF-2α expression. Furthermore, proposing eNOS as a therapeutic target fosters innovative therapies for PCa with NO inhibitors, which are employed in preclinical trials in non-oncological diseases.
Simona Nanni, Valentina Benvenuti, Annalisa Grasselli, Carmen Priolo, Aurora Aiello, Stefania Mattiussi, Claudia Colussi, Vittoria Lirangi, Barbara Illi, Manuela D’Eletto, Anna Maria Cianciulli, Michele Gallucci, Piero De Carli, Steno Sentinelli, Marcella Mottolese, Paolo Carlini, Lidia Strigari, Stephen Finn, Elke Mueller, Giorgio Arcangeli, Carlo Gaetano, Maurizio C. Capogrossi, Raffaele Perrone Donnorso, Silvia Bacchetti, Ada Sacchi, Alfredo Pontecorvi, Massimo Loda, Antonella Farsetti
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 398 | 92 |
94 | 37 | |
Figure | 366 | 44 |
Table | 46 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 45 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 70 | 0 |
Totals | 1,019 | 174 |
Total Views | 1,193 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.