Sepsis results in a state of relative immunosuppression, rendering critically ill patients susceptible to secondary infections and increased mortality. Monocytes isolated from septic patients and experimental animals display a “deactivated” phenotype, characterized by impaired inflammatory and antimicrobial responses, including hyporesponsiveness to LPS. We investigated the role of the LPS/TLR4 axis and its inhibitor, IL-1 receptor–associated kinase–M (IRAK-M), in modulating the immunosuppression of sepsis using a murine model of peritonitis-induced sepsis followed by secondary challenge by intratracheal Pseudomonasaeruginosa. Septic mice demonstrated impaired alveolar macrophage function and increased mortality when challenged with intratracheal Pseudomonas as compared with nonseptic controls. TLR2 and TLR4 expression was unchanged in the lung following sepsis, whereas levels of IRAK-M were upregulated. Macrophages from IRAK-M–deficient septic mice produced higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines ex vivo and greater costimulatory molecule expression in vivo as compared with those of their WT counterparts. Following sepsis and secondary intrapulmonary bacterial challenge, IRAK-M–/– animals had higher survival rates and improved bacterial clearance from lung and blood compared with WT mice. In addition, increased pulmonary chemokine and inflammatory cytokine production was observed in IRAK-M–/– animals, leading to enhanced neutrophil recruitment to airspaces. Collectively, these findings indicate that IRAK-M mediates critical aspects of innate immunity that result in an immunocompromised state during sepsis.
Jane C. Deng, Genhong Cheng, Michael W. Newstead, Xianying Zeng, Koichi Kobayashi, Richard A. Flavell, Theodore J. Standiford
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 653 | 161 |
88 | 31 | |
Figure | 382 | 6 |
Table | 87 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 63 | 0 |
Totals | 1,273 | 198 |
Total Views | 1,471 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.