Administration of IL-2 to HIV-infected patients leads to expansion of a unique subset of CD4+CD45RO–CD25+ cells. In this study, the origin, clonality, and function of these cells were investigated. Analysis of TCR excision circles revealed that the CD4+CD45RO–CD25+ cells were the product of peripheral expansion but remained polyclonal as determined by TCR repertoire analysis. Phenotypically, these cells were distinct from naturally occurring Tregs; they exhibited intermediate features, between those of memory and naive cells, and had lower susceptibility to apoptosis than CD45RO–CD25– or memory T cells. Studies of intracellular cytokine production and proliferation revealed that cytokine-expanded naive CD25+ cells had low IL-2 production and required costimulation for proliferation. Despite elevated expression of forkhead transcription factor P3 (foxP3), they exerted only weak suppression compared with CD45RO+CD25+high cells (Tregs). In summary, in vivo IL-2 administration to HIV-infected patients leads to peripheral expansion of a population of long-lived CD4+CD45RO–CD25+ cells that express high levels of foxP3 but exert weak suppressive function. These CD4+CD25+ cytokine-expanded naive cells, distinct from antigen-triggered cells and Tregs, play a role in the maintenance of a state of low turnover and sustained expansion of the CD4+ T cell pool.
Irini Sereti, Hiromi Imamichi, Ven Natarajan, Tomozumi Imamichi, Meena S. Ramchandani, Yunden Badralmaa, Steve C. Berg, Julia A. Metcalf, Barbara K. Hahn, Jean M. Shen, April Powers, Richard T. Davey, Joseph A. Kovacs, Ethan M. Shevach, H. Clifford Lane
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 558 | 17 |
60 | 24 | |
Figure | 291 | 8 |
Table | 93 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 43 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 75 | 0 |
Totals | 1,120 | 49 |
Total Views | 1,169 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.