BACKGROUND. Partial protective immunity to schistosomiasis develops over time, following repeated praziquantel treatment. Moreover, animals develop protective immunity after repeated immunisation with irradiated cercariae. Here, we evaluated development of natural immunity through consecutive exposure-treatment cycles with Schistosoma mansoni (Sm) in healthy, Schistosoma-naïve participants using single-sex controlled human Sm infection. METHODS. Twenty-four participants were randomised double-blind (1:1) to either the reinfection group, which received three exposures (week 0,9,18) to 20 male cercariae or the infection control group, which received two mock exposures with water (week 0,9) prior to cercariae exposure (week 18). Participants were treated with praziquantel (or placebo) at week 8, 17 and 30. Attack rates after the final exposure (week 19-30) using serum circulating anodic antigen (CAA) positivity were compared between groups. Adverse events were collected for safety. RESULTS. Twenty-three participants completed follow-up. No protective efficacy was seen, given 82% (9/11) attack rate after the final exposure in the reinfection group and 92% (11/12) in the infection control group (protective efficacy 11%; 95% CI -24% to 35%; p =0.5). Related adverse events were higher after the first infection (45%), compared to the second (27%) and third infection (28%). Severe acute schistosomiasis was observed after the first infections only (2/12 in reinfection group and 2/12 in infection control group). CONCLUSION. Repeated Schistosoma exposure and treatment cycles resulted in apparent clinical tolerance, with fewer symptoms reported with subsequent infections, but did not result in protection against reinfection. TRIAL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05085470. FUNDING. ERC Starting grant (no. 101075876).
Jan Pieter R. Koopman, Emma L. Houlder, Jacqueline J. Janse, Olivia A.C. Lamers, Geert V.T. Roozen, Jeroen C. Sijtsma, Miriam Casacuberta-Partal, Stan T. Hilt, M.Y. Eileen C. van der Stoep, Inge M. van Amerongen-Westra, Eric A.T. Brienen, Linda J. Wammes, Lisette van Lieshout, Govert J. van Dam, Paul L.A.M. Corstjens, Angela van Diepen, Maria Yazdanbakhsh, Cornelis H. Hokke, Meta Roestenberg
Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 628 | 0 |
201 | 0 | |
Figure | 3 | 0 |
Table | 2 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 38 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 22 | 0 |
Totals | 894 | 0 |
Total Views | 894 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.