BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is an effective treatment in a subset of patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); however, the majority of patients are refractory.METHODS In a nonrandomized, open-label Phase 1b clinical trial, participants with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC were treated with low-dose 5-azacytidine (5-aza) daily for either 5 or 10 days in combination with durvalumab and tremelimumab after progression on ICB. The primary objective was to assess the biologically effective dose of 5-aza as determined by molecular changes in paired baseline and on-treatment tumor biopsies; the secondary objective was safety.RESULTS Thirty-eight percent (3 of 8) of participants with evaluable paired tissue samples had a greater-than 2-fold increase from baseline in IFN-γ signature and CD274 (programmed cell death protein 1 ligand, PD-L1) expression within the tumor microenvironment (TME), which was associated with increased CD8+ T cell infiltration and decreased infiltration of CD4+ T regulatory cells. The mean neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) decreased by greater than 50%, from 14.2 (SD 22.6) to 6.9 (SD 5.2). Median overall survival (OS) was 16.3 months (95% CI 1.9, NA), 2-year OS rate was 24.7% (95% CI: 4.5%, 53.2%), and 58% (7 of 12) of treated participants demonstrated prolonged OS of greater than 12 months.CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that low-dose 5-aza can reprogram systemic host immune responses and the local TME to increase IFN-γ and PD-L1 expression. The increased expression of these established biomarkers correlated with prolonged OS upon ICB rechallenge.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03019003.FUNDING NIH/NCI P01 CA240239.
Tingting Qin, Austin K. Mattox, Jean S. Campbell, Jong Chul Park, Kee-Young Shin, Shiting Li, Peter M. Sadow, William C. Faquin, Goran Micevic, Andrew J. Daniels, Robert Haddad, Christopher S. Garris, Mikael J. Pittet, Thorsten R. Mempel, Anne ONeill, Maureen A. Sartor, Sara I. Pai
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 240 | 0 |
143 | 0 | |
Figure | 43 | 0 |
Table | 7 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 183 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 2 | 0 |
Totals | 618 | 0 |
Total Views | 618 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.