BACKGROUND Malaria transmission-blocking vaccines aim to interrupt the transmission of malaria from one person to another.METHODS The candidates R0.6C and ProC6C share the 6C domain of the Plasmodium falciparum sexual-stage antigen Pfs48/45. R0.6C utilizes the glutamate-rich protein (GLURP) as a carrier, and ProC6C includes a second domain (Pfs230-Pro) and a short 36–amino acid circumsporozoite protein (CSP) sequence. Healthy adults (n = 125) from a malaria-endemic area of Burkina Faso were immunized with 3 intramuscular injections, 4 weeks apart, of 30 μg or 100 μg R0.6C or ProC6C each adsorbed to Alhydrogel (AlOH) adjuvant alone or in combination with Matrix-M (15 μg or 50 μg, respectively). The allocation was random and double-blind for this phase I trial.RESULTS The vaccines were safe and well tolerated with no vaccine-related serious adverse events. A total of 7 adverse events, mild to moderate in intensity and considered possibly related to the study vaccines, were recorded. Vaccine-specific antibodies were highest in volunteers immunized with 100 μg ProC6C-AlOH with Matrix-M, and 13 of 20 (65%) individuals in the group showed greater than 80% transmission-reducing activity (TRA) when evaluated in the standard membrane feeding assay at 15 mg/mL IgG. In contrast, R0.6C induced sporadic TRA.CONCLUSION All formulations were safe and well tolerated in a malaria-endemic area of Africa in healthy adults. The ProC6C-AlOH/Matrix-M vaccine elicited the highest levels of functional antibodies, meriting further investigation.TRIAL REGISTRATION Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za) PACTR202201848463189.FUNDING The study was funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (grant RIA2018SV-2311).
Alfred B. Tiono, Jordan L. Plieskatt, Alphonse Ouedraogo, Ben Idriss Soulama, Kazutoyo Miura, Edith C. Bougouma, Mohammad Naghizadeh, Aissata Barry, Jean Baptist B. Yaro, Sem Ezinmegnon, Noelie Henry, Ebenezer Addo Ofori, Bright Adu, Susheel K. Singh, Augustin Konkobo, Karin Lövgren Bengtsson, Amidou Diarra, Cecilia Carnrot, Jenny M. Reimer, Amidou Ouedraogo, Moussa Tienta, Carole A. Long, Issa N. Ouedraogo, Issaka Sagara, Sodiomon B. Sirima, Michael Theisen
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 2,969 | 291 |
838 | 136 | |
Figure | 776 | 0 |
Table | 598 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 393 | 14 |
Citation downloads | 186 | 0 |
Totals | 5,760 | 441 |
Total Views | 6,201 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.