Anomalies during angiogenesis can initiate the formation of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), characterized by aberrant connections between arteries and veins and fast lesional blood flow. These anomalies can manifest anywhere in the body, including the brain, and they typically appear at birth and evolve alongside growth of the individual. Depending on their location and size, AVMs can induce progressive deformation, chronic pain, functional impairment, and ulceration and pose life-threatening risks such as hemorrhage and organ dysfunction. The primary treatment modalities entail surgical intervention or embolization followed by surgery. However, these approaches are often challenging and seldom offer definitive resolution. In addition, inadequately performed surgery may trigger angiogenic rebound, fostering AVM recurrence. Advancements in comprehending the molecular pathways underlying AVMs have sparked interest in repurposing targeted therapies initially devised for cancer treatment. The first results are promising, giving new hope to the patients affected with these often devastating and debilitating lesions, the management of which presents major clinical challenges.
Julien Coulie, Emmanuel Seront, Miikka Vikkula, Laurence M. Boon
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 451 | 0 |
81 | 0 | |
Figure | 63 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 2 | 0 |
Totals | 597 | 0 |
Total Views | 597 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.