Recent studies using murine animal model systems indicate that clinical progression of autoimmune disease may be due to the sequential accumulation of neoautoreactivity characterized by extensive plasticity of self recognition. In the present study, we addressed the question of whether a similar paradigm of self recognition is implicated in the development of multiple sclerosis (MS), a demyelinating disease with a presumed autoimmune etiology. Our approach was to determine serial changes over a 12-18-mo period in response to an epitope-mapping series of 265 12-mer peptides of myelin proteolipid protein (PLP) by patients with isolated monosymptomatic demyelinating syndromes (IMDS), a group of distinct clinical disorders with variable rates of progression to MS. Our data showed that an extensive array of proteolipid protein peptides could elicit autoreactivity. Moreover, differential autoreactive patterns were evident within IMDS patient subpopulations. Monocentric monophasic IMDS patients with no evidence of prior subclinical disease typically showed fully sustained autoreactivity characterized by extensive plasticity, epitope focusing, shifting, and spreading of responses to new self determinants. In contrast, multicentric monophasic IMDS patients with putative evidence of prior asymptomatic lesion formation typically showed partially sustained autoreactivity characterized by abrupt abrogation of responses to an extensive array of self determinants. No sustained autoreactivity was observed in normal control subjects or in patients with other neurologic diseases. Our results indicate that self recognition associated with the development of MS is a developmental process characterized by autoreactive diversity, plasticity, and instability.
V K Tuohy, M Yu, B Weinstock-Guttman, R P Kinkel
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 197 | 94 |
51 | 27 | |
Citation downloads | 53 | 0 |
Totals | 301 | 121 |
Total Views | 422 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.