Paraoxonase was identified as a genetic risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in recent studies focusing on a polymorphism affecting position 191. A second polymorphism of the paraoxonase gene affects position 54 and involves a methionine (M allele) to leucine (L allele) change. It was investigated in diabetic patients (n = 408) with and without vascular disease. There were highly significant differences in plasma concentrations and activities of paraoxonase between genotypes defined by the 54 polymorphism: MMAA, MLAA, LLAA; protein, 65.3+/-18.0, 77.9+/-18.0, 93.5+/-26.0 microg/ml; P < 0.0001: activity (phenylacetate), 48.6+/-13.5, 64.1+/-14.5, 68.1+/-13.0 U/ml; P < 0.0001. The 191 variant had little impact on paraoxonase concentrations. Homozygosity for the L allele was an independent risk factor for CVD (odds ratio 1.98 (1.07-3.83); P = 0.031). A linkage disequilibrium (P < 0.0001) was apparent between the mutations giving rise to leucine and arginine at positions 54 and 191, respectively. The study underlines that susceptibility to CVD correlates with high activity paraoxonase alleles. The 54 polymorphism would appear to be of central importance to paraoxonase function by virtue of its association with modulated concentrations. The latter could explain the association between both the 54 and 191 polymorphisms and CVD.
M C Garin, R W James, P Dussoix, H Blanché, P Passa, P Froguel, J Ruiz
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 233 | 64 |
98 | 27 | |
Citation downloads | 51 | 0 |
Totals | 382 | 91 |
Total Views | 473 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.