Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1996;97(10):2192-2203. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI118660.
Abstract
This study was performed to determine effects of atrial and brain natriuretic peptides (ANP, BNP) on neutrophils-induced endothelial injury which is known to play a role in the pathophysiology of ischemia/reperfusion myocardial injury and to examine whether the effects of ANP and BNP on neutrophils are modulated by neutral endopeptidase 24.11 (NEP) in neutrophils themselves. The incubation of human neutrophils with ANP and BNP inhibited the neutrophils-induced detachment of cultured human endothelial cells (HEC). The inhibitory effect of ANP and BNP was associated with the suppressions of the neutrophils adhesiveness to HEC, CD18 expression on the neutrophils and elastase release from the neutrophils. Coincubation with UK73967 or phosphoramidon, inhibitors of NEP, potentiated all of the effects of ANP and BNP on the neutrophil functions, and the NEP inhibitors protected degradation of ANP and BNP by the neutrophils. NEP enzymatic activity in the particulate fractions and immunoreactive NEP expression were found to increase in the neutrophils from patients with early phase of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by 5.2- and by 4.2-fold of the neutrophils from patients with late phase of AMI, respectively. In an in vivo canine model of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion, the intravenous administration of UK73967 suppressed the neutrophil adherence to endothelium and the neutrophil accumulation in the ischemic/reperfused myocardium. The results indicate that ANP and BNP, which are known to increase in AMI, modulate the neutrophil functions and exert protective effects against the neutrophils-induced endothelial cytotoxity. But the effects are suppressed due to their degradation by the neutrophil own NEP. Thus, neutrophil NEP, which also increases in AMI, may play a role in the pathophysiology of neutrophils-mediated ischemia/reperfusion endothelial and myocardial injury.
Authors
T Matsumura, K Kugiyama, S Sugiyama, M Ohgushi, K Amanaka, M Suzuki, H Yasue
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 144 | 24 |
| 43 | 18 | |
| Citation downloads | 50 | 0 |
| Totals | 237 | 42 |
| Total Views | 279 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)