Growth hormone (GH) has an important role in the regulation of hepatic LDL receptor expression and plasma lipoprotein levels. This investigation was undertaken to evaluate if these effects of GH on hepatic LDL receptors are direct or mediated by insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). Two models were studied in which substitution with GH is important for the regulation of hepatic LDL receptors: hypophysectomized rats receiving high-dose ethynylestradiol or challenge with dietary cholesterol. The hypophysectomized rats were hormonally substituted by infusion with dexamethasone and L-thyroxine, and either GH or IGF-I. In both models, GH was essential for maintaining normal expression of LDL receptors. In contrast, despite fully normalized plasma levels, IGF-I did not support the expression of hepatic LDL receptors. Analysis of plasma lipoproteins revealed that substitution with GH, but not with IGF-I, reduced LDL and intermediate density lipoproteins. In addition, determination of hepatic mRNA levels for apo B-100 and apo B-48 indicated that GH may be more effective than IGF-I in the promotion of apo B mRNA editing. In conclusion, GH has specific effects on hepatic LDL receptor expression and plasma lipoprotein levels that are not mediated by IGF-I.
M Rudling, H Olivecrona, G Eggertsen, B Angelin
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 106 | 19 |
57 | 22 | |
Citation downloads | 43 | 0 |
Totals | 206 | 41 |
Total Views | 247 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.