The mechanisms responsible for the loss of cell potassium during renal ischemia are poorly understood. The present studies examined the hypothesis that potassium channels are activated as an early response to hypoxia and contribute to potassium loss independent from an inhibition of active K+ uptake. Potassium flux in suspensions of freshly isolated rat proximal tubules was measured using an ion-selective electrode. Exposure of the tubules to hypoxia for only 2.5 min resulted in a rise in the passive leak rate of K+ but no decrease in active K+ uptake. The passive leak of K+ was associated with a 40% decrease in cell ATP content. The passive K+ efflux was inhibited by 5 mM Ba2+ (95%) and by 15 mM tetraethylammonium (85%) suggesting that K+ channels were the primary route of K+ movement. The effects of K+ channel blockade on the development of hypoxic injury were also examined. Tetraethylammonium and glibenclamide, an inhibitor of ATP-sensitive K+ channels, reduced hypoxic injury as assessed by the release of lactate dehydrogenase or measurement of DNA damage. These results suggest that activation of K+ channels is an early response to hypoxia and contributes to hypoxic renal injury.
W B Reeves, S V Shah
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 123 | 4 |
46 | 26 | |
Scanned page | 218 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
Totals | 448 | 31 |
Total Views | 479 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.