During static exercise, heart failure (HF) subjects activate the sympathetic nervous system differently than normal controls. HF causes metaboreceptor desensitization with either enhanced mechanoreceptor activity or central command. In this report, we examined whether increased muscle interstitial pressure, as seen in HF, augments other neural systems. We measured muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; peroneal nerve) in 10 normals during static exercise (40% maximal voluntary grip) and posthandgrip circulatory arrest (PHG-CA). This was repeated after venous congestion (VC; cuff inflation to 90 mmHg). VC increased forearm volume (plethysmography) by 4.7%. MSNA responses to exercise were greater after VC (150.5 +/- 41.8 vs. 317.3 +/- 69.9 arbitrary units; P < 0.01). However, MSNA responses during PHG-CA were not affected by VC, and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (n = 5) demonstrated no effect of VC on pH or H2PO4-. Similar effects of VC on MSNA were noted after ischemic exercise (n = 7), excluding flow alterations as the explantation. VC probably sensitized mechanically sensitive afferents since MSNA during involuntary biceps contractions increased after VC (n = 6), and skin sympathetic nerve responses during handgrip, an index of central command, were not increased by VC (n = 6).
J McClain, C Hardy, B Enders, M Smith, L Sinoway
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 125 | 0 |
41 | 23 | |
Scanned page | 236 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 45 | 0 |
Totals | 447 | 27 |
Total Views | 474 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.