It has recently been discovered that both mineralocorticoid (MC) and glucocorticoid (GC) hormones can stimulate electrogenic Na+ absorption by mammalian collecting duct cells in culture. In primary cultures of rat inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) cells, 24-h incubation with either MC or GC agonist stimulates Na+ transport approximately threefold. We have now determined that the effects were not additive, but the time courses were different. As aldosterone is known to stimulate citrate synthase, Na+/K+ ATPase activity, and ouabain binding in cortical collecting duct principal cells, we determined the effects of steroids on these parameters in IMCD cells. MC and GC agonists both produced a small increase in citrate synthase activity. There was no increase in Na+/K+ ATPase activity but specific ouabain binding was increased more than two-fold by either agonist. To determine the role of apical Na+ entry in the steroid-induced effects, the Na+ channel inhibitor, benzamil, was used. Benzamil did not alter the stimulation of citrate synthase activity by either steroid. In contrast, GC stimulation of ouabain binding was prevented by benzamil, whereas MC stimulation was not. We conclude that there are differences in the way that MC and GC hormones produce an increased Na+ transport. Both appear to produce translocation (or activation) of pumps into the basolateral membrane. GC stimulation of pump translocation requires increased Na+ entry whereas MC stimulation does not.
J R Laplace, R F Husted, J B Stokes
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 88 | 2 |
44 | 25 | |
Scanned page | 250 | 5 |
Citation downloads | 45 | 0 |
Totals | 427 | 32 |
Total Views | 459 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.