Low HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels may elevate atherosclerosis risk, and often associate with hypertriglyceridemia (HTG); however, the metabolic causes of low HDL-C levels with or without HTG are poorly understood. We studied the turnover of radioiodinated HDL apolipoproteins, apo A-I and apo A-II, in 15 human subjects with low HDL-C, six with normal plasma TG levels (group 1) and nine with high TG (group 2), and compared them to 13 control subjects with normal HDL-C and TG levels (group 3). The fractional catabolic rate (FCR) was equally elevated in groups 1 and 2 vs. group 3 for both apo A-I (0.313 +/- 0.052 and 0.323 +/- 0.063 vs. 0.245 +/- 0.043 pools/d, P = 0.003) and apo A-II (0.213 +/- 0.036 and 0.239 +/- 0.037 vs. 0.185 +/- 0.031 pools/d, P = 0.006). Thus, high FCR characterized low HDL-C regardless of the presence or absence of HTG. In contrast, transport rate (TR) of apo A-I did not differ significantly among the groups and the apo A-II TR differed only between groups 2 and 3 (2.15 +/- 0.57, 2.50 +/- 0.39, and 1.83 +/- 0.48 mg/kg per d for groups 1 to 3, respectively, P = 0.016). Several HDL-related factors were similar in groups 1 and 2 but differed in group 3, as with FCR, including the ratio of lipoprotein lipase to hepatic lipase activity (LPL/HL) in post-heparin plasma, the ratio of the HDL-C to apo A-I plus apo A-II levels, and the percent of tracer in the d greater than 1.21 fraction. In linear regression analysis HDL-C levels correlated inversely with the FCR of apo A-I and apo A-II (r = -0.74, P less than 0.0001 for both). Major correlates of FCR were HDL-C/apo A-I + apo A-II, LPL/HL, and plasma TG levels. We hypothesize that lipase activity and plasma TG affect HDL composition which modulates FCR, which in turn regulates HDL-C. Thus, HTG is only one of several factors which may contribute to elevated FCR and low HDL-C. Given the relationship of altered HDL composition with high FCR and low HDL-C levels, factors affecting HDL composition may increase atherosclerosis susceptibility.
E A Brinton, S Eisenberg, J L Breslow
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 228 | 4 |
66 | 23 | |
Scanned page | 350 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 60 | 0 |
Totals | 704 | 30 |
Total Views | 734 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.