Previously we showed that hypocaloric amounts of glucose reduce leucine catabolism while an isocaloric amount of fat does not (1985. J. Clin. Invest. 76:737.). This study was designed to investigate whether the same difference exists when the entire caloric need is provided either as glucose or lipid. Rats were maintained for 3 d on total parenteral nutrition (350 cal/kg per d), after which the infusion of amino acids was discontinued and rats received the same amount of calories entirely as glucose or lipid for three more days. A third group of rats was infused with saline for 3 d. In comparison to glucose, lipid infusion resulted in higher urinary nitrogen excretion (55 +/- 3 vs. 37 +/- 2 mg N/24 h, P less than 0.05), muscle concentrations of tyrosine (95 +/- 8 vs. 42 +/- 8 microM, P less than 0.01), and leucine (168 +/- 19 vs. 84 +/- 16 microM, P less than 0.01), activity of BCKA dehydrogenase in muscle (2.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.04 nmol/mg protein per 30 min, P less than 0.05), and whole body rate of leucine oxidation (3.3 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.2 mumol/100 g per h, P less than 0.05). However, all these parameters were significantly lower in lipid-infused than starved rats. There was no significant difference between leucine incorporation into liver and muscle proteins of lipid and glucose-infused rats. On the other hand, starved rats showed a lower leucine incorporation into liver proteins. The data show that under conditions of adequate caloric intake lipid has an inhibitory effect on leucine catabolism but not as great as that of glucose. The mechanism of this difference may be related to a lesser inhibition of muscle protein degradation by lipid than glucose, thereby increasing the leucine pool, which in turn stimulates leucine oxidation.
J A Vazquez, H S Paul, S A Adibi
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 118 | 1 |
53 | 22 | |
Scanned page | 324 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 50 | 0 |
Totals | 545 | 25 |
Total Views | 570 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.