We have characterized cell-to-cell communication (coupling) within intact human skin by microinjecting single keratinocytes with a gap junction-permeant tracer (Lucifer Yellow). 25-50 keratinocytes from different layers of the epidermis were seen to be coupled after most injections (n = 31). A few noncommunicating cells were also microinjected (n = 3) or observed within large territories of coupled keratinocytes. Microinjections of dermal fibroblasts demonstrated an extensive coupling (greater than 100 fibroblasts); however, none of the keratinocyte (n = 34) or fibroblast (n = 3) injections revealed coupling between the epidermal and dermal compartments. Cell coupling was found to be more extensive in epidermal ridges than in suprapapillary plates and, in both regions, was less extensive after injection of the basal layer of the epidermis than after that of the suprabasal layers. This study shows that junctional cell-to-cell communications take place in normal and fully differentiated human tissue. The quantitative data gathered also indicate a regional heterogeneity of keratinocyte-to-keratinocyte communication within intact adult skin and the lack of effect of retinoids on this pattern.
D Salomon, J H Saurat, P Meda
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 178 | 35 |
41 | 53 | |
Figure | 0 | 3 |
Scanned page | 238 | 21 |
Citation downloads | 59 | 0 |
Totals | 516 | 112 |
Total Views | 628 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.