Resting diabetic patients may have excessively rapid heart rates, reduced heart rate variability, and subnormal plasma catecholamine levels. Although all of these abnormalities may relate in some way to baroreceptor reflex function, there have been surprisingly few attempts to evaluate systematically baroreflex mechanisms in diabetic patients. Accordingly, we studied autonomic responses over a range of pharmacologically induced arterial pressure changes in 10 unselected young adult insulin-dependent diabetic patients who had no symptoms of autonomic neuropathy, and 12 age-matched nondiabetic subjects. Sympathetic responses were estimated from antecubital vein plasma norepinephrine levels, and parasympathetic responses were estimated from electrocardiographic R-R intervals and their variability (standard deviation). Both were correlated with other noninvasive indexes of peripheral and central nervous system function. Multiple derangements of baroreflex function were found in the diabetic patients studied. Sympathetic abnormalities included subnormal baseline norepinephrine levels, virtual absence of changes of norepinephrine levels during changes of arterial pressure, and supranormal pressor responses to phenylephrine infusions. Parasympathetic abnormalities included subnormal baseline standard deviations of R-R intervals, and R-R interval prolongations during elevations of arterial pressure which were unmistakably present, but subnormal. Our data suggest that in diabetic patients, subnormal baseline plasma norepinephrine levels may signify profound, possibly structural defects of sympathetic pathways. Subnormal resting levels of respiratory sinus arrhythmia may have different implications, however, since vagal, unlike sympathetic reflex abnormalities, can be reversed partly by arterial pressure elevations.
D L Eckberg, S W Harkins, J M Fritsch, G E Musgrave, D F Gardner
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 114 | 3 |
63 | 21 | |
Scanned page | 310 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 59 | 0 |
Totals | 546 | 27 |
Total Views | 573 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.