The treatment of verapamil toxicity was examined in lightly sedated dogs. Verapamil, administered as a bolus (0.72 mg/kg) followed by a continuous infusion (0.11 mg/kg per min), decreased cardiac output (CO) from 3.1 +/- 0.1 to 1.7 +/- 0.1 liter/min (P less than 0.001), heart rate (HR) from 85 +/- 4 to 57 +/- 3 beats/min (P less than 0.001), left ventricular derivative of pressure with respect to time (LV dP/dt) from 2,085 +/- 828 to 783 +/- 78 mm Hg/s (P less than 0.001), mean aortic pressure (AO) from 77 +/- 4 to 38 +/- 2 mm Hg (P less than 0.001) and stroke volume from 39 +/- 3 to 28 +/- 2 ml/beat (P less than 0.01). In verapamil-toxic animals isoproterenol increased HR, CO, LV dP/dt, and AO; calcium chloride increased LV dP/dt and AO; norepinephrine, epinephrine, and dopamine increased CO, AO, and LV dP/dt, atropine increased HR, CO, and AO. Phenylephrine (13-55 micrograms/kg per min) produced no changes except a small increase in AO while very high dose phenylephrine (300 micrograms/kg per min) increased AO, CO, and LV dP/dt. 4-Aminopyridine (4-AP) increased HR, CO, LV dP/dt, and AO. When administered prior to verapamil, 4-AP prevented the development of verapamil toxicity as shown by the significantly higher AO (P less than 0.001), CO (P less than 0.01), and LV dP/dt (P less than 0.01) when 4-AP followed by verapamil was compared to verapamil alone. In conclusion, there does not appear to be a single specific therapy for verapamil toxicity, however it can be partially corrected by presently available pharmacologic therapy and 4-AP.
R Gay, S Algeo, R Lee, M Olajos, E Morkin, S Goldman
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 154 | 17 |
56 | 29 | |
Scanned page | 245 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 54 | 0 |
Totals | 509 | 49 |
Total Views | 558 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.