To determine the structural requirements for parathyroid hormone (PTH) activity in mature bone, we perfused the surgically isolated hindquarters of adult male rats with either native bovine PTH-(1-84) [bPTH-(1-84)] or the synthetic amino-terminal fragment, bovine PTH-(1-34) [bPTH-(1-34)]. Changes in the release of cyclic AMP (cAMP) and bone Gla protein (BGP) were monitored as evidence of bone-specific response to PTH; tissue specificity of the cAMP response was confirmed through in vitro examination on nonskeletal tissue response to PTH. Biologically active, monoiodinated 125I-bPTH-(1-84) was administered to determine if mature murine bone cleaves native hormone. We found that perfused rat bone continuously releases BGP, and that both bPTH-(1-84) and bPTH-(1-34) acutely suppress this release. In addition, both hormones stimulate cAMP release from perfused rat hindquarters. When examined on a molar basis, the magnitude of the cAMP response was dose-dependent and similar for both hormones, with doses yielding half-maximal cAMP responses. The response for bPTH-(1-34) was 0.5 nmol and for bPTH-(1-84) was 0.7 nmol. Moreover, biologically active 125I-bPTH-(1-84) was not metabolized in our hindquarter perfusion system. These findings indicate that PTH-(1-84) does not require extraskeletal or skeletal cleavage to an amino-terminal fragment in order to stimulate cAMP generation in, or suppress BGP release from, mature rat bone.
M S Calvo, M J Fryer, K J Laakso, R A Nissenson, P A Price, T M Murray, H Heath 3rd
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 102 | 1 |
43 | 18 | |
Scanned page | 217 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 45 | 0 |
Totals | 407 | 23 |
Total Views | 430 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.