Interferons (IFN) have been shown to suppress the proliferation of human erythroid progenitors (erythroid burst-forming units [BFU-E] and colony-forming units [CFU-E]) in vitro. To examine the mechanism(s) underlying this inhibitory activity, the effect of different doses (50-10,000 U) of a highly purified preparation of recombinant DNA produced human gamma-IFN on erythroid colony formation by normal human bone marrow BFU-E and CFU-E in the presence and absence of monocytes and/or T lymphocytes was studied. The addition of gamma-IFN to whole marrow caused suppression of BFU-E (6-65%) and CFU-E (31-79%) in a dose-dependent fashion. This inhibition occurred both with the direct addition of gamma-IFN to the culture plates as well as by the preincubation of marrow cells with gamma-IFN followed by the washing of the cells; at the highest concentration of gamma-IFN (10,000 U), near-maximal inhibition of colony formation occurred with as little as 15 min of preexposure (BFU-E, 50%; CFU-E, 81%). Removal of monocytes and/or T lymphocytes before the addition of gamma-IFN significantly reduced the inhibitory effects of this lymphokine (BFU-E, -1 to 38%; CFU-E, -8 to 67%). Co-culture of purified autologous monocytes or T cells preexposed to gamma-IFN with monocyte and T cell-depleted marrow cells resulted in highly significant inhibition of erythroid colony formation even when these treated cells comprised less than 1% of the total nucleated cell populations in culture. The inhibitory action of gamma-IFN was not prevented or reversed by erythropoietin. These results demonstrate that the inhibitory effects of gamma-IFN on erythropoiesis are mediated to a significant degree through accessory cell populations, and suggest that gamma-IFN may represent a useful tool in the study of the role of immunocompetent cells in the regulation of erythropoiesis in vitro.
S W Mamus, S Beck-Schroeder, E D Zanjani
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 133 | 2 |
65 | 25 | |
Scanned page | 261 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 50 | 0 |
Totals | 509 | 29 |
Total Views | 538 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.