Variations in DNA sequences flanking the insulin gene were studied in relation to noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) in 87 unrelated Pima Indians at least 35 yr of age. DNA was isolated from nuclei of peripheral blood leukocytes and digested with restriction endonucleases. Less variation in this region was found in Pima Indians than in other racial groups previously studied. Only two classes of alleles (classes 1 and 3) were found, and there was virtually no variation within classes. At least one class 3 allele was found in 47% of the 38 nondiabetic subjects and in 37% of the 49 with NIDDM (odds ratio = 0.65, P = 0.4, 95% confidence interval for the odds ratio = 0.25 to 1.67). Homozygosity for class 3 alleles, however, was found only in diabetics. There were no differences according to genotype in obesity, fasting or postload glucose or insulin concentrations, or in the relationships between insulin and glucose concentrations. 61% (11/18) of the diabetics with a class 3 allele were receiving drug treatment for diabetes compared with only 26% (8/31) of diabetics without a class 3 allele (P = 0.03). The insulin gene polymorphism probably plays no important role in the genesis of NIDDM in Pima Indians, nor does it influence the glucose or insulin concentrations or their relationship to each other, but the class 3 allele, especially when homozygous in this population, may influence the severity of the disease as indicated by need for drug treatment.
W C Knowler, D J Pettitt, B Vasquez, P S Rotwein, T L Andreone, M A Permutt
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 105 | 0 |
47 | 16 | |
Scanned page | 237 | 6 |
Citation downloads | 45 | 0 |
Totals | 434 | 22 |
Total Views | 456 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.