The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of acetazolamide on cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen (CMRO2). CBF, arterial and jugular venous partial O2 pressure, partial CO2 pressure, pH, and O2 saturation percentage were measured in six patients before and 3 and 20 minutes after intravenous administration of 1 g of acetazolamide. CBF was measured by the intracarotid 133xenon injection technique. In addition, changes in CBF were estimated from the arteriovenous oxygen content difference. CBF increased in all patients after acetazolamide, by approximately 55 and 70% after 3 and 20 min, respectively. The CBF changes were of the same order whether calculated from the 133Xe clearance or from the arteriovenous oxygen differences (A-V)O2. CMRO2, calculated from (A-V)O2 differences and CBF, remained constant. Except for an increase in the venous oxygen saturation, the blood gases remained constant. Acetazolamide, in a dose sufficient to inhibit the erythrocyte carbonic anhydrase (EC 4.2.1.1), thus induced a rapid and marked increase in CBF, leaving CMRO2 unchanged. This effect of acetazolamide on CBF is probably explained by a decrease in brain pH rather than by brain tissue hypoxia due to inhibition of oxygen unloading in the brain capillaries.
S Vorstrup, L Henriksen, O B Paulson
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 295 | 0 |
79 | 50 | |
Scanned page | 213 | 28 |
Citation downloads | 43 | 0 |
Totals | 630 | 78 |
Total Views | 708 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.