The hydrolysis of sphingolipids by lysosomal enzymes requires the presence of additional proteins, which have been called activator proteins. The number of activator proteins, their specificity, exact mechanism of action, and response to a storage process all remain to be determined. In this study, antibodies to an activator protein known to bind sphingolipids and activate the enzymatic hydrolysis of GM1 ganglioside and sulfatide were used to estimate the concentration of this activator protein in small samples of liver and brain from patients with lysosomal storage diseases. By using rocket immunoelectrophoresis, the concentration of cross-reacting material (CRM) was determined. Control livers had an average of 0.95 +/- 0.18 (mean +/- 1 SD) microgram CRM/mg protein in the extracts, and control brains had an average of 0.25 +/- 0.14 microgram CRM/mg protein. Extremely high levels of CRM were found in extracts of livers from patients with type 1 GM1 gangliosidosis (15.1 and 16.9), and type A Niemann-Pick disease (10.7). Extracts of brain samples revealed a large amount of CRM in type 1 GM1 gangliosidosis (14.8), Tay-Sachs disease (5.3 and 8.7), and Sandhoff disease (13.5). Significantly elevated CRM was also measured in brain samples from patients with type 2 GM1 gangliosidosis, type A Niemann-Pick disease, metachromatic leukodystrophy, and Krabbe disease. The highest levels are found in those genetic diseases where the lipids stored, primarily or secondarily to the genetic defect, bind to this activator protein. This activator protein may have an important function in regulating intralysosomal lipid catabolism, and changes in its concentration in certain genetic diseases may be the cause of clinical, biochemical, and pathological heterogeneity found in the patients.
K Inui, D A Wenger
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 111 | 0 |
47 | 18 | |
Figure | 0 | 1 |
Scanned page | 229 | 6 |
Citation downloads | 42 | 0 |
Totals | 429 | 25 |
Total Views | 454 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.