One cloned complementary DNA and one genomic subclone were used to detect restriction fragment length polymorphism associated with the pro alpha 2(I) gene for human type I procollagen. The restriction fragments obtained from examination of 30-122 chromosomes confirmed previous indications that the pro alpha 2(I) gene is found in a single copy in the human haploid genome. One highly polymorphic site was detected with EcoRI in the 5'-half of the gene. The restriction site polymorphism at the site had an allelic frequency of 0.38, and it generated two fragments of 10.5 and 3.5 kilobase in homozygous individuals. The restriction fragment length polymorphism generated at the EcoRI site was used to study affected and non-affected individuals in four generations of a family with an autosomal dominant form of osteogenesis imperfecta. The data demonstrated a linkage of the phenotype to a pro alpha 2(I) allele with a lod score of 2.41 at a recombination fraction (theta) of 0. The data therefore provided presumptive evidence that osteogenesis imperfecta in this family is caused by a mutation in the pro alpha 2(I) gene or some contiguous region of the genome. The relatively high frequency of polymorphism at the EcoRI site makes it useful for studying a broad range of genetic disorders in which mutations in type I procollagen are suspected. In addition, the polymorphic site should provide useful markers for linkage studies with other loci located on human chromosome 7.
P Tsipouras, J C Myers, F Ramirez, D J Prockop
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 109 | 2 |
62 | 22 | |
Scanned page | 222 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 56 | 0 |
Totals | 449 | 28 |
Total Views | 477 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.