The purpose of our study was to identify central nervous system sites involved in the respiratory depressant effect of drugs that stimulate opioid receptors. Diacetylmorphine (heroin) was administered into several cerebroventricular regions of chloralose-anesthetized cats, while monitoring pulmonary ventilation with a Fleisch pneumotachograph. Administration of heroin (17, 50, 150, and 450 micrograms) into the forebrain ventricles, which was restricted to these ventricles, resulted in no significant respiratory effects. In contrast, administration of heroin into either the fourth ventricle or the cisterna magna resulted in a significant (P less than 0.05) decrease in respiratory minute volume (VE). In the fourth ventricle this was because of a decrease in frequency (f) and in the cisterna magna, to a decrease in tidal volume (VT). Intravenous administration of heroin in the same dose-range produced a decrease in VE, which was primarily due to a decrease in f. Bilateral application of heroin (70 micrograms/side) to each of three ventral medullary surface sites (Mitchell's, Schlaefke's, and Loeschcke's areas) known to influence respiration elicited a decrease in VE only at Mitchell's area. This decrease was due to decreases in f and VT. The role of this site in the action of intravenously administered heroin was tested by topical application of naloxone to this area in animals with respiratory depression evoked by intravenous heroin. Bilateral application of naloxone (15 micrograms/side) to Mitchell's area restored breathing to normal. These results lead us to suggest that the site of heroin-induced respiratory depression is a specific area (Mitchell's area) on the ventral surface of the medulla.
A M Taveira da Silva, J D Souza, J A Quest, F D Pagani, J M Moerschbaecher, A Buller, P Hamosh, R A Gillis
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 263 | 7 |
60 | 17 | |
Scanned page | 263 | 10 |
Citation downloads | 40 | 0 |
Totals | 626 | 34 |
Total Views | 660 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.