17 patients with chronic ventilatory failure (including 14 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) were studied to determine the causes of carbon dioxide retention and the chronic effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate on ventilatory drive and acid-base status. Carbon dioxide retention in patients with high mechanical loads occurred concomitantly with a higher than normal inspiratory effort (mouth occlusion pressure) and normal minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production ratio (V̇e/V̇co2); but with shortened inspiratory time (1.3±0.1 vs. 1.8±3 s), increased breathing frequency (17±1 vs. 14±1 breaths/min), low tidal volume (0.57±0.03 vs. 0.88±0.04 L), and high dead space to tidal volume ratio (0.63±0.02 vs. 0.39±0.07). Using a randomized application of treatment and placebo conditions, it was shown that 4 wk of medroxyprogesterone acetate caused significant reductions in Paco2 (from 51±1 to 42±1 mm Hg) in 10 of 17 patients. This “correction” of Paco2 in these patients was associated with increases in mouth occlusion pressure (14%), tidal volume (11%), and alveolar ventilation (15%) compared to placebo, although inspiratory time remained shortened. Arterial and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pH was alkaline compared to placebo in patients who “corrected” Paco2. No change was noted in lung mechanics or core temperature. Common prerequisites for correction of Paco2 with medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment were the ability to significantly lower Paco2 upon acute voluntary hyperventilation and to increase tidal volume rather than breathing frequency in response to the drug. We attribute chronic CO2 retention in these patients to alterations in respiratory cycle timing and to a neuromuscular inspiratory effort which is adequate for the level of tissue CO2 production, but inadequate in the presence of mechanical and ventilation-perfusion abnormalities to normalize arterial blood gases.
James B. Skatrud, Jerome A. Dempsey, Praful Bhansali, Charles Irvin
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 172 | 4 |
55 | 66 | |
Scanned page | 263 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 47 | 0 |
Totals | 537 | 73 |
Total Views | 610 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.