Using an isolated perfused rat pancreas preparation, the interrelationship between the endocrine and exocrine portions of the pancreas were studied. Addition of exogenous rat insulin (1-20 mU/ml) to the perfusing solution potentiated the action of cholecystokinin (CCK) (1 mU/ml) to increase both pancreatic juice flow and the release of the enzyme, amylase. Raising the glucose concentration in the perfusing solution from 2.5 to 17.5 mM both increased endogenous insulin release and potentiated the CCK-induced exocrine secretory response. Two lines of evidence indicated that this effect of glucose on the exocrine pancreas was mediated by endogenous insulin release. First, the addition of comparable amounts of xylose or galactose to the perfusion medium neither released insulin nor potentiated the CCK-induced response. Second, epinephrine blocked the effect of high glucose on both insulin release and potentiation of CCK action. Epinephrine alone did not affect the action of CCK. The magnitude of the exocrine response induced by high glucose was comparable to that of 2.5 mU/ml exogenous insulin. It seems possible that pancreatic acinar cells can be exposed to insulin levels of this magnitude in situ.
A Saito, J A Williams, T Kanno
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 117 | 3 |
51 | 21 | |
Scanned page | 189 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 53 | 0 |
Totals | 410 | 26 |
Total Views | 436 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.