To investigate the mechanism of exercise-induced bronchospasm, we measured specific airway conductance before and after exercise in 7 healthy normals, 12 asthmatics with intact carotid bodies, and 5 asthmatics who had had bilateral carotid body resection. The subjects breathed either air or oxygen (randomly assigned) during cycle ergometer exercise. Post-exercise bronchodilation was the usual pattern in normals, whereas post-exercise bronchospasm occurred in all asthmatics who breathed air during exercise. Oxygen breathing during exercise markedly attenuated the post-exercise bronchospasm in those asthmatics with intact carotid bodies, but had no significant effect in those without effect in those without carotid bodies. The attenuation of the bronchospasm with oxygen occurred with either incremental or constant load exercise of high intensity. The degree of attenuation did not correlate significantly with changes in end-tidal PCO2, maximum work rate, maximum exercise ventilation, or maximum heart rate. These studies indicate that oxygen attenuates exercise-induced bronchospasm in asthmatics through its action on the carotid bodies.
P L Schiffman, A Ryan, B J Whipp, J E Hansen, K Wasserman
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 102 | 2 |
40 | 17 | |
Scanned page | 240 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 40 | 0 |
Totals | 422 | 23 |
Total Views | 445 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.