Rabbit cortical collecting tubules were perfused in vitro to investigate the control of bicarbonate transport. Bicarbonate was measured by microcalorimetry as total CO2. The perfusate and bath were identical solutions containing 25 mM bicarbonate at pH 7.4. The mean pH of the urine in the bladders of untreated rabbits at the time they were killed was 7.4. Their individual tubules, studied in vitro, either absorbed or secreted bicarbonate, and, combining the results, there was on the average no significant net transport. When the rabbits were treated with NH4Cl the day before the experiment, their urine was acidic and their tubules studied in vitro absorbed bicarbonate (i.e., there was net lumen-to-bath transport). In contrast, when the rabbits were treated with NaHCO3, their urine was significantly more alkaline, and their tubules studied in vitro generally secreted bicarbonate (i.e., net bath-to-lumen transport). Thus, the direction of bicarbonate transport by cortical collecting tubules studied under standard conditions in vitro correlated with the urine pH and was determined by the preceding treatment of the animals in vivo with acidifying or alkalinizing salts. These results demonstrate a previously unrecognized mechanism which contributes to the control of urinary bicarbonate excretion.
T D McKinney, M B Burg
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 199 | 5 |
66 | 16 | |
Scanned page | 112 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
Totals | 438 | 23 |
Total Views | 461 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.