Spatial and nonspatial aspects of TQ-ST segment mapping were studied with the solid angle theorem and randomly coded data from 15,000 electrograms of 160 anterior descending artery occlusions each of 100-s duration performed in 18 pigs. Factors analyzed included electrode location, ischemic area and shape, wall thickness, and increases in plasma potassium (K+). Change from control in the TQ-ST recorded at 60 s (ΔTQ-ST) was measured at 22 ischemic (IS) and nonischemic (NIS) epicardial sites overlying right (RV) and left (LV) ventricles. In IS regions, ΔTQ-ST decreased according to LV > septum > RV and LV base > LV apex. In NIS regions, LV sites had negative (Neg) ΔTQ-ST which increased as LV IS border was approached. However, RV NIS had positive (Pos) ΔTQ-ST which again increased as RV IS border was approached. With large artery occlusion IS area increased 123±18%, ΔTQ-ST at IS sites decreased (−38.1±3.6%), and sum of ΔTQ-ST at IS sites increased by only 67.3±10.3%. In RV NIS Pos ΔTQ-ST became Neg. With increased K+, ΔTQ-ST decreased proportionately to log K+ (r = 0.97±0.01) at IS and NIS sites on the epicardium and precordium. TQ-ST at 60 s was obliterated when K+ = 8.7±0.2 mM. All findings were significant (P < 0.005) and agreed with the solid angle theorem. Thus, a transmembrane potential difference and current flow at the IS boundary alone are responsible for the TQ-ST. Nonspatial factors affect the magnitude of transmembrane potential difference, while spatial factors alter the position of the boundary to the electrode site.
Roger P. Holland, Harold Brooks, Barbara Lidl
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 118 | 2 |
61 | 26 | |
Scanned page | 641 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 43 | 0 |
Totals | 863 | 28 |
Total Views | 891 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.