The objects of these experiments were to determine to what extent oleic acid, removed from plasma by forearm muscles, was oxidized immediately, and to search for evidence of an intramuscular lipid pool which may be composed to triglycerides synthesized from plasma free fatty acids and which may supply substantial portions of lipid substrates for oxidation by muscle. To these ends (1-14C]oleic acid was infused at constant rate into the brachial artery of seven healthy young men at rest in the postabsorptive state. Results were: (1) muscle respiratory quotient (0.76) implied that about 80% of the oxygen consumed was for the oxidation of lipid. (2) Muscle free fatty acid uptake, had it been oxidized directly, could account for more than 100% of observed oxygen uptake. (3) There was a lag of at least 30 min before 14CO2 appeared in forearm venous blood. (4) 14CO2 release from forearm muscle tended to reach an apparent plateau after 3 h of infusion of [14C]oleic acid. (5) During the time of plateau 14CO2 release, oleic acid extracted from plasma could account for only 20% of oxygen consumption; most of the oleic acid taken up was not oxidized directly. (6) 14CO2 release persisted at a high level during the 1-3 h follow-up period after the infusion ended. (7) Neither the delay in initial appearance of 14CO2 nor its continued release after cessation of infusion was due to delay and distribution in a forearm CO2 pool, since intra-arterial infusion of NaH14CO3 in additional subjects demonstrated much more rapid distribution of 14CO2 in the forearm. Results show that most, if not all, free fatty acids taken up by resting muscle are not oxidized directly, but probably enter an intramuscular pool which has a slow turnover during resting metabolism and is the immediate source of oxidized lipid substrate.
G R Dagenais, R G Tancredi, K L Zierler
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 189 | 11 |
47 | 48 | |
Scanned page | 409 | 10 |
Citation downloads | 54 | 0 |
Totals | 699 | 69 |
Total Views | 768 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.