Platelets from individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia show increased sensitivity to the aggregating atents, epinephrine and ADP. Since the mechanism of this abnormal sensitivity is unknown, we examined, in vitro, the influence of the plasma lipid environment on the function of platelets. The composition of plasma lipids was altered by the addition of sonicated cholesterol-dipalmitoyl lecithin liposomes which were "cholesterol normal" (cholesterol-phospholipid mole ratio [C/P] equals 1.0, "cholesterol rich" (C/P eauals 2.2), or "cholesterol poor" (C/P equals 0). Cholesterol-normal liposomes had no influence on platelet lipids or platelet function. In contrast, after incubation for 5 h at 37 degrees C with cholesterol-rich liposomes, normal platelets acquired 39.2% excess cholesterol with no change in phospholipids or protein. The percent increase in platelet membrane cholesterol was three-fold that of the granule fraction. The acquisition of cholesterol by platelets was associated with a 35-fold increase in sensitivity to epinephrine-induced aggregation (P less than 0.001) and 15-fold increase to ADP aggregation (P less than 0.001), as determined both by aggregometry and by [13C]serotonin release. Response to thrombin or collagen was unchanged. Platelets incubated with cholesterol-poor liposomes underwent a selective loss of 21.4% cholesterol and this was associated with an 18-fold reduction in their sensitivity to epinephrine. These studies demonstrate that the cholesterol content of platelets is dependent on the lipid composition of the milier. Cholesterol acquired by platelets may exert its effect on platelet function by a modification of the platelet membrane.
S J Shattil, R Anaya-Galindo, J Bennett, R W Colman, R A Cooper
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 262 | 0 |
119 | 25 | |
Figure | 0 | 3 |
Scanned page | 286 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 45 | 0 |
Totals | 712 | 31 |
Total Views | 743 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.