It has been suggested that the glomerular basement membrane restricts the passage of large molecules only, the barrier to filtration of smaller molecules being at the level of the epithelial slit pore. This hypothesis was investigated by measuring glomerular permeability to 125I-labeled polydisperse polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) in 16 children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) and in 6 children of comparable age who had no evidence of renal disease. Studies were performed in the patients with INS before, during, and after treatment with steroids. PVP in blood and urine samples was separated according to molecular size by solumn chromatography, to permit the calculation of permeability to inert macromolecules of sizes ranging from 8,000 mol wt. In untreated INS, glomerular permeability to molecules > 40 Å was normal; permeability to smaller molecules was markedly reduced, frequently to 20% or less of normal. There was an average decrease in inulin clearance (Cin) of 24%. Glomerular permeability and Cin returned to normal in INS treated with steroids only when proteinuria disappeared. The results support the concept, derived from studies with ultrastructural tracers, that the final barrier to filtration may be at the level of the epithelial slit pore. Thus fusion of the epithelial foot processed with obliteration of the slit pores was associated with impaired passage of smaller molecules of PVP into the urine. Reversal of the pathologic abnormality resulted in return of permeability to normal. The decreased Cin seen in INS may not reflect true glomerular filtration rate, but may result from restricted passage of inulin molecules (mol wt 5,000) through the epithelial slit pore.
Alan M. Robson, Joseph Giangiacomo, Randy A. Kienstra, Saiyid T. Naqvi, Julie R. Ingelfinger
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 162 | 12 |
66 | 30 | |
Figure | 0 | 3 |
Scanned page | 339 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 45 | 0 |
Totals | 612 | 49 |
Total Views | 661 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.