Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1974;54(5):1135-1143. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107857.
Abstract
The effect of mannitol upon glomerular ultrafiltration was examined in hydropenic Munich-Wistar rats. Superficial nephron filtration rate (sngfr) rose from 32.0±0.9 nl/min/g kidney wt to 42.0±1.6 (P < 0.001) in eight rats. Hydrostatic pressure gradients acting across the glomerular capillary (ΔP) were measured in glomerular capillaries and Bowman's space with a servo-nulling device, systemic (πA) and efferent arteriolar oncotic pressures (πE) were determined by microprotein analysis. These data were applied to a computer-based mathematical model of glomerular ultrafiltration to determine the profile of effective filtration pressure (EFP = ΔP — π) and total glomerular permeability (LpA) in both states. Filtration equilibrium obtained in hydropenia (LpA ≥ 0.099±0.006 nl/s/g kidney wt/mm Hg) and sngfr rose because EFP increased from a maximum value of 4.2±1.1 to 12.8±0.5 mm Hg after mannitol (P <0.01). This increase was due to both increased nephron plasma flow and decreased πA. Computer analysis of these data revealed that more than half (>58%) of this increase was due to decreased πA, consequent to dilution of protein. Since EFP was disequilibrated after mannitol, LpA could be calculated accurately (0.065 ± 0.003 nl/s/g kidney wt/mm Hg) and was significantly lower than the minimum estimate in hydropenia.
Authors
Roland C. Blantz
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 138 | 2 |
| 59 | 31 | |
| Scanned page | 365 | 7 |
| Citation downloads | 54 | 0 |
| Totals | 616 | 40 |
| Total Views | 656 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)