A patient has been described previously who presented at age 13 with vitamin B12 (B12) deficiency secondary to a functionally abnormal intrinsic factor (IF). IF has now been isolated from the gastric juice of the patient, his sister, and both parents, who are first cousins, by using affinity chromatography on B12-Sepharose. Patient IF appeared normal in terms of (a) B12 binding, (b) mol wt, (c) total amino acid and carbohydrate composition, and (d) immunodiffusion with rabbit anti-patient and anti-normal IF sera. After adsorption with normal IF, however, anti-patient IF serum precipitated the various IFs as follows: patient IF (> 95%); mother, father, and sister IF (50%); and normal IF (< 10%). Additional adsorption with mother, father, or sister IF completely inhibited the precipitation of patient IF. The association constant determined for patient IF-B12 and human ileal mucosal homogenates (0.1 × 109 M-1) was 60-fold lower than that determined with normal IF-B12 (6.0 × 109 M-1). Intermediate amounts of ileal IF-B12 binding were observed with mother, father, and sister IF-B12. These in vitro studies were supported by multiple Schilling tests, performed with a totally gastrectomized volunteer, that gave the following mean urinary excretions of [57Co]B12: free B12 (0.5%); + patient gastric juice (2.6%); + mother or father gastric juice (17%); and + normal gastric juice (26%). These studies demonstrate that the patient is homozygous and that the mother, father, and sister are heterozygous for a structurally abnormal IF that has a markedly decreased, but not absent, affinity for ileal IF-B12 receptors. These studies also indicate that the B12 and ileal binding sites are located on different portions of the IF molecule.
Max Katz, Carol S. Mehlman, Robert H. Allen
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 132 | 0 |
67 | 27 | |
Scanned page | 301 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 50 | 0 |
Totals | 550 | 30 |
Total Views | 580 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.