A material similar to the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG-β) was detected in serum (300 ng/ml) and tumor extract from a 75-yr-old man with pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma. This material was indistinguishable from hCG-β in three different types of radioimmunoassay that displayed widely varying reactions with glycoprotein trophic hormones and their subunits. In gel chromatography there appeared to be heterogeneity of the serum beta-like immunoactivity, including one component that coeluted with standard hCG-β tracer and another immunologically indistinguishable component that displayed a slightly lower elution volume. Neither complete human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) nor its alpha subunit was detected in radioimmunoassays of serum, before or after fractionation, or in tumor extract. The absence of complete hCG was confirmed in a gonadotropin bioassay sensitive to 15 ng of hCG, which showed no bioactivity in serum or tumor extract containing 450 and 90 ng of hCG-β, respectively. This case probably represents the first demonstration of isolated polypeptide subunit production of ectopic origin and suggests that hCG-β, as well as other subunits, may prove useful as cancer markers.
Bruce D. Weintraub, Saul W. Rosen
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 114 | 2 |
56 | 26 | |
Scanned page | 270 | 7 |
Citation downloads | 54 | 0 |
Totals | 494 | 35 |
Total Views | 529 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.